April 27, 2017 By Mark Samuels 2 min read

Retail fraud continues to rise, and there is significant growth in online attacks across all sectors. Forter’s “2016 Fraud Attack Index” showed a 69.9 percent rise in attacks against apparel websites and goods. Luxury goods were also targeted, with an average fraud rate of $5.91 at risk out of $100 of sales.

The report, created in collaboration with the Merchant Risk Council, highlighted the continued presence of retail fraud as well as the shifted priorities and techniques of attackers. Retail IT decision-makers should pay attention to attack trends and consider ways to respond.

Understanding the Rise in Retail Fraud

Overall, 2016 saw a moderate increase of 8.9 percent for online fraud attacks from January to December. But there was also a 79 percent year-over-year increase in fraud risk for domestic holiday orders during Q4.

Forter suggested the rise in domestic online attacks and card-not-present (CNP) fraud is significant but unsurprising. U.S. fraudsters have moved online following the October 2015 adoption of Europay, MasterCard and Visa (EMV) cards, a move that made it harder to copy physical cards.

Michael Reitblat, CEO of Forter, suggested that the significant growth in fraud attack rates in the apparel industry might also be related to EMV adoption. Fraudsters who have recently joined the online criminal ranks might be sticking to a sector they understand, he said in a press release.

Detailing Other Report Trends

However, this rising trend doesn’t seem to be entirely universal: The fraud attack rate for international markets dropped by 13 percent compared to 2015. Forter researchers described this fall as a surprise, since international orders were found to be 62.4 percent riskier than domestic ones throughout 2016. They attributed the drop to a growth in genuine international orders rather a fall in fraud.

In the online service payment sector, researchers highlighted a 131 percent rise in account takeover (ATO). Specifically, there was a shift to online payment ATO, drawing away from attempts to break into accounts on retailers’ websites.

The research also provided statistics on the frequency of retail fraud attacks in a range of key verticals, including:

  • Travel and hospitality (33 percent decrease);
  • Luxury (8.4 percent decrease);
  • Electronics (1.8 percent decrease);
  • Digital goods (22.6 percent decrease); and
  • Food and beverages (49.8 percent increase).

Fraud prevention firm Verifi told CSO Online that every $1 stolen costs retailers an additional $3.08 in lost time, services or merchandise. The crime doesn’t just hit retailers financially, but throughout multiple departments in an organization.

Finding Ways to Respond Effectively

Retailers must find the right balance between fraud coverage and strong defense strategies that might be too restrictive and alienate customers. It is crucial for retail organizations to understand attack trends and make the necessary security investments.

These organizations should aim for a customizable technological platform that allows for the fine-tuning of fraud mitigation according to market and attack patterns. Merchants and issuers should also consider ways to share information that can help resolve fraud claims easily in the event that a breach does occur.

More from

Smoltalk: RCE in open source agents

26 min read - Big shoutout to Hugging Face and the smolagents team for their cooperation and quick turnaround for a fix! Introduction Recently, I have been working on a side project to automate some pentest reconnaissance with AI agents. Just after I started this project, Hugging Face announced the release of smolagents, a lightweight framework for building AI agents that implements the methodology described in the ReAct paper, emphasizing reasoning through iterative decision-making. Interestingly, smolagents enables agents to reason and act by generating…

4 ways to bring cybersecurity into your community

4 min read - It’s easy to focus on technology when talking about cybersecurity. However, the best prevention measures rely on the education of those who use technology. Organizations training their employees is the first step. But the industry needs to expand the concept of a culture of cybersecurity and take it from where it currently stands as an organizational responsibility to a global perspective.When every person who uses technology — for work, personal use and school — views cybersecurity as their responsibility, it…

How red teaming helps safeguard the infrastructure behind AI models

4 min read - Artificial intelligence (AI) is now squarely on the frontlines of information security. However, as is often the case when the pace of technological innovation is very rapid, security often ends up being a secondary consideration. This is increasingly evident from the ad-hoc nature of many implementations, where organizations lack a clear strategy for responsible AI use.Attack surfaces aren’t just expanding due to risks and vulnerabilities in AI models themselves but also in the underlying infrastructure that supports them. Many foundation…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today