March 7, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Security researchers in Israel recently published research on a hardware-based attack on smartphones that can obtain the cryptographic keys used by OpenSSL to protect high-value assets used by the device. Both Android and older iOS systems are vulnerable to this exploit.

While listening to the electromagnetic radiation patterns of PCs has long been known as a potential vulnerability, this is the first time such an approach has been implemented for smartphones. In this exploit, an attacker can measure electromagnetic radiation and power consumption in a phone using an inexpensive magnetic probe or makeshift USB reader. These readings fluctuate in ways that depend on key information.

How It Works

The algorithm under attack is called the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA), a digital signature algorithm used in many applications.

The technique involves signal processing and a lattice-based algorithm for recovering the secret signing key. The lattice aggregates partial information discovered from a few thousand randomized signing operations.

What Systems Are Vulnerable?

Researchers reported that several systems are vulnerable to these OpenSSL attacks. For example, OpenSSL 1.0.x is vulnerable except when the library uses an alternative implementation for some elliptic curves. OpenSSL 1.1.x is also vulnerable with minor exceptions.

OpenSSL’s developers told researchers that “hardware side-channel attacks are not in OpenSSL’s threat model,” so no updates are planned to mitigate the attacks. This could be a major problem for the crypto library since it is so widely used.

But it’s not only OpenSSL that has problems: Researchers found that iOS 7.1.2-8 is vulnerable. However, iOS 9.x has a different crypto mechanism and shows no sign of the vulnerability.

CoreBitcoin is also vulnerable. When contacted by the researchers before the paper was made public, the developers expressed their intention to switch to the more secure library in the future. As an alternative, the latest version of Bitcoin Core, which was released in February 2015, is not vulnerable.

While this particular research did not extend its testing to Android, other independent works have. A recent paper and RSA Conference presentation disclosed that Android’s version of BouncyCastle is vulnerable.

OpenSSL Key Protection

The major takeaway here is to be aware that this attack, whether done by a magnetic loop or a USB device, is possible. While proximity is required for it to succeed, the range may be extended with sensitive equipment. Knowing that such an exploit is possible may just be enough to avoid the situations that enable it.

More from

When ransomware kills: Attacks on healthcare facilities

4 min read - As ransomware attacks continue to escalate, their toll is often measured in data loss and financial strain. But what about the loss of human life? Nowhere is the ransomware threat more acute than in the healthcare sector, where patients’ lives are literally on the line.Since 2015, there has been a staggering increase in ransomware attacks on healthcare facilities. And the impacts are severe: Diverted emergency services, delayed critical treatments and even fatalities. Meanwhile, the pledge some ransomware groups made during…

AI and cloud vulnerabilities aren’t the only threats facing CISOs today

6 min read - With cloud infrastructure and, more recently, artificial intelligence (AI) systems becoming prime targets for attackers, security leaders are laser-focused on defending these high-profile areas. They’re right to do so, too, as cyber criminals turn to new and emerging technologies to launch and scale ever more sophisticated attacks.However, this heightened attention to emerging threats makes it easy to overlook traditional attack vectors, such as human-driven social engineering and vulnerabilities in physical security.As adversaries exploit an ever-wider range of potential entry points…

4 trends in software supply chain security

4 min read - Some of the biggest and most infamous cyberattacks of the past decade were caused by a security breakdown in the software supply chain. SolarWinds was probably the most well-known, but it was not alone. Incidents against companies like Equifax and tools like MOVEit also wreaked havoc for organizations and customers whose sensitive information was compromised.Expect to see more software supply chain attacks moving forward. According to ReversingLabs' The State of Software Supply Chain Security 2024 study, attacks against the software…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today