February 27, 2018 By David Bisson 2 min read

More than half of external attackers use social engineering as their point of entry into target organizations, a new study on incident response revealed.

According to F-Secure’s “Incident Response Report,” 52 percent of external attackers used social engineering to infiltrate target companies. The remaining 48 percent exploited technical weaknesses.

Social Engineering Attacks by the Numbers

The majority of social engineering instances occurred in targeted attacks, the study found. The financial, manufacturing, security and technology industries all experienced campaigns in which bad actors picked a target and went after it. In fact, some verticals, such as the gaming, public and service sectors, encountered only targeted campaigns.

Not all attacks were targeted, however. There were also opportunistic campaigns in which nefarious individuals struck simply because they saw an opportunity to do so. These attacks accounted for 45 percent of incident response investigations disclosed by the company’s security consultants.

F-Secure’s experts observed numerous subtypes of incidents. The most common subcategory was attacks in which threat actors abused a weakness in an organization’s internet infrastructure (21 percent). That’s just 1 percent higher than insider threats (20 percent), followed by malicious email attachments (18 percent), phishing/spear phishing (16 percent) and brute force (9 percent).

Security consultants also witnessed wide discrepancies in attackers’ progress. In 29 percent of cases, bad actors succeeded only in breaching the perimeter. Many others went further than that and capitalized on their headway by deploying malware (20 percent) and exfiltrating data (12 percent).

Room for Improvement in Incident Response

In total, 79 percent of these reported attacks were successful, while 13 percent were false positives resulting from “IT problems or other issues being misunderstood as security incidents by the reporting organization.”

F-Secure principal security consultant Tom Van de Wiele said he believes these findings reflect the challenge of figuring out whether an incident occurred. “Once an organization has the facts based on detection capabilities, and not rumors or assumptions, then the process can continue with the next step, which is usually containment and eradication,” he said, as quoted in an F-Secure blog post.

The authors of the report advised companies to invest in better detection capabilities, such as an endpoint detection and response solution. They also emphasized the importance of using threat intelligence to more quickly and efficiently respond to security incidents and eliminate false positives.

More from

When ransomware kills: Attacks on healthcare facilities

4 min read - As ransomware attacks continue to escalate, their toll is often measured in data loss and financial strain. But what about the loss of human life? Nowhere is the ransomware threat more acute than in the healthcare sector, where patients’ lives are literally on the line.Since 2015, there has been a staggering increase in ransomware attacks on healthcare facilities. And the impacts are severe: Diverted emergency services, delayed critical treatments and even fatalities. Meanwhile, the pledge some ransomware groups made during…

AI and cloud vulnerabilities aren’t the only threats facing CISOs today

6 min read - With cloud infrastructure and, more recently, artificial intelligence (AI) systems becoming prime targets for attackers, security leaders are laser-focused on defending these high-profile areas. They’re right to do so, too, as cyber criminals turn to new and emerging technologies to launch and scale ever more sophisticated attacks.However, this heightened attention to emerging threats makes it easy to overlook traditional attack vectors, such as human-driven social engineering and vulnerabilities in physical security.As adversaries exploit an ever-wider range of potential entry points…

4 trends in software supply chain security

4 min read - Some of the biggest and most infamous cyberattacks of the past decade were caused by a security breakdown in the software supply chain. SolarWinds was probably the most well-known, but it was not alone. Incidents against companies like Equifax and tools like MOVEit also wreaked havoc for organizations and customers whose sensitive information was compromised.Expect to see more software supply chain attacks moving forward. According to ReversingLabs' The State of Software Supply Chain Security 2024 study, attacks against the software…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today