December 3, 2015 By Larry Loeb 3 min read

Ethereum is a system for decentralized applications that uses blockchains, but in a completely different manner than how they are used in bitcoin.

The Basic Framework

Ethereum has at its core a way to apply arbitrary rules for ownership, transaction formats and state transition functions — taking both the state of a blockchain and a transaction for that chain, and then outputting a new state as its result. It does this by way of an internal scripting language that is aware of a system’s state while being Turing-complete, which means it can encode any computation that may be performed by the system.

The state is made of objects called accounts, which have a 20-byte address and state transitions that exist between accounts. Accounts have four fields: a nonce, so each transaction is processed only once; a balance of ether, or the internal numbers used to pay fees; a contract code that may be empty; and storage, which may also be empty.

Types of Ethereum Accounts

There are two kinds of Ethereum accounts: externally owned and contract accounts. Externally owned accounts are controlled by private keys and contain no code. Sending messages from an externally owned account is done by creating and signing a transaction.

Contract accounts are controlled by their contract code. Every time the contract account receives a message, its code activates, allowing it to read and write to internal storage, send other messages or create contracts in turn.

It must be understood that contract here does not mean a legal arrangement: It is instead an agent inside the framework that executes code when it is stimulated by a message or transaction. It also has control over its own ether balance as well as other internal variables.

Other words have special meanings here. Gas isn’t gasoline, but the cost of one computation step. The value may be higher or lower, depending on the difficulty of the computation. Each transaction sets a limit on how many computational steps it can use by using Gas to specify the upper bound. Thus, Gas is the fuel powering computation; when you run out of Gas, execution stops.

Code inside of contracts is written in Ethereum virtual machine (EVM) code, a series of bytes each representing an operation. It is much like assembly code in concept. Serpent is a higher-level language that compiles to EVM.

What Does This Mean for the IoT?

Blockchains are at their heart a time-stamped (or other unique identifier) ledger of transactions. It’s the transactions involved in the Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem where the system will shine: Because one can trigger computation or other code action with an Ethereum account message, an IoT device can be controlled if it is connected to an Ethereum-based network.

Work has already begun to develop a comprehensive system of IoT control using Ethereum as a component, according to the IBM report “Device Democracy: Saving the Future of the Internet of Things.” As this paper puts it, “The greatest challenge, however, is not in simply building a decentralized IoT, but one that can scale universally while maintaining private, secure and trustless transactions. In other words, the IoT represents a case of billions of players, not all of which can be trusted — some even malicious — with a need for some form of validation and consensus. And for this, the ‘blockchain’ offers a very elegant solution.”

Ethereum is a more full-featured way to use blockchain technology than bitcoin, which was designed only for financial purposes. By including the ability to use internal executable code, far more can be done with it. And that is what the IoT will require.

At this point, the framework is in its Frontier release. That means it is best suited for developers or other early adopters. That also means that it is a wide-open field in terms of competition and usage. For the strong of heart, opportunities abound to either succeed or fail.

The Time Has Come

Major players have finally come to see the opportunities and disruptions that blockchain technology can cause for their operational and financial assumptions. While they are now aware of alternatives, nothing has yet been set in stone.

While this framework could implement a cryptocurrency, it can do much more than that. It is generalized, not specialized. The practical limits of what it can do are yet to be determined.

Now is the time when developers have the maximum opportunity: What they come up with in these early stages can be considered by those who will implement it outside of a closed environment. Ethereum is up on Github for all to use. Making a useful product from it will not be easy and will require learning an unfamiliar environment. Better start now.

More from Cloud Security

2024 Cloud Threat Landscape Report: How does cloud security fail?

4 min read - Organizations often set up security rules to help reduce cybersecurity vulnerabilities and risks. The 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report discovered that 40% of all data breaches involved data distributed across multiple environments, meaning that these best-laid plans often fail in the cloud environment.Not surprisingly, many organizations find keeping a robust security posture in the cloud to be exceptionally challenging, especially with the need to enforce security policies consistently across dynamic and expansive cloud infrastructures. The recently released X-Force…

Cloud threat report: Why have SaaS platforms on dark web marketplaces decreased?

3 min read - IBM’s X-Force team recently released the latest edition of the Cloud Threat Landscape Report for 2024, providing a comprehensive outlook on the rise of cloud infrastructure adoption and its associated risks.One of the key takeaways of this year’s report was focused on the gradual decrease in Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platforms being mentioned across dark web marketplaces. While this trend potentially points to more cloud platforms increasing their defensive posture and limiting the number of exploits or compromised credentials that are surfacing,…

Cloud Threat Landscape Report: AI-generated attacks low for the cloud

2 min read - For the last couple of years, a lot of attention has been placed on the evolutionary state of artificial intelligence (AI) technology and its impact on cybersecurity. In many industries, the risks associated with AI-generated attacks are still present and concerning, especially with the global average of data breach costs increasing by 10% from last year.However, according to the most recent Cloud Threat Landscape Report released by IBM’s X-Force team, the near-term threat of an AI-generated attack targeting cloud computing…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today