July 12, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Recent research revealed a startling gap in security awareness among U.S. business leaders. According to an NTT Security report, “Business Security: Always a Journey, Never a Destination,” three-quarters of non-IT leaders at U.S. firms believe that the European Union’s (EU) upcoming General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does not apply to them.

But the problem is not confined to the U.S. The study found that business leaders in Hong Kong (29 percent), Australia (26 percent) and Singapore (33 percent) also lacked awareness of the law and its impact on any organization that houses data collected from EU subjects.

The study involved workers in the U.S., U.K., Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Sweden, Norway, Hong Kong, Australia and Singapore. Thirty-five percent of the respondents were C-level executives.

Lack of Awareness Stymies GDPR Preparedness

The GDPR will kick in on May 25, 2018. The regulation will govern how organizations handle data breaches and store personally identifiable information (PII). For example, data cannot be exported from the EU without special handling or transmitted to a third party without explicit user consent.

To comply with the GDPR, a company must know where its data is being stored and who can access it. Unfortunately, the NTT Security study found that one-third of employees had no idea where data resides, and pointed to the need for immediate training on the subject. Of the two-thirds of employees who knew where data was stored, less than half understood how the regulation would affect it.

“While the GDPR is a European data protection initiative, the impact will be felt right across the world for anyone who collects or retains personally identifiable data from any individual in Europe,” said Garry Sidaway, senior vice president at NTT Security, in a news release. “Our report clearly indicates that a significant number do not yet have it on their radar or are ignoring it.”

Incident Response Adjustments

Security leaders must also make adjustments to their incident response strategies to maintain compliance with the GDPR. In the event of a data breach, for example, the regulation requires security teams to report the incident to the appropriate EU regulator within 72 hours, SecurityWeek reported.

An incident response plan, which was fully understood by less than half of the survey’s respondents, extends far beyond the IT and security departments. Each part of the business must know its responsibilities and how to deal with them should a security event arise, or risk facing the consequences of the GDPR.

More from

AI decision-making: Where do businesses draw the line?

4 min read - "A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision."- IBM Training Manual, 1979Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption is on the rise. According to the IBM Global AI Adoption Index 2023, 42% of enterprises have actively deployed AI, and 40% are experimenting with the technology. Of those using or exploring AI, 59% have accelerated their investments and rollouts over the past two years. The result is an uptick in AI decision-making that leverages intelligent tools…

When ransomware kills: Attacks on healthcare facilities

4 min read - As ransomware attacks continue to escalate, their toll is often measured in data loss and financial strain. But what about the loss of human life? Nowhere is the ransomware threat more acute than in the healthcare sector, where patients’ lives are literally on the line.Since 2015, there has been a staggering increase in ransomware attacks on healthcare facilities. And the impacts are severe: Diverted emergency services, delayed critical treatments and even fatalities. Meanwhile, the pledge some ransomware groups made during…

AI and cloud vulnerabilities aren’t the only threats facing CISOs today

6 min read - With cloud infrastructure and, more recently, artificial intelligence (AI) systems becoming prime targets for attackers, security leaders are laser-focused on defending these high-profile areas. They’re right to do so, too, as cyber criminals turn to new and emerging technologies to launch and scale ever more sophisticated attacks.However, this heightened attention to emerging threats makes it easy to overlook traditional attack vectors, such as human-driven social engineering and vulnerabilities in physical security.As adversaries exploit an ever-wider range of potential entry points…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today