April 4, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Security researchers at Sucuri revisited a paper written in 2012 focused on the security of API calls. When used, these calls assumed the integrity of underlying libraries such as JSSE, OpenSSL and GnuTLS, or of data transport libraries such as cURL. However, researchers discovered the TLS certificate used to validate the entire transaction can be spoofed.

Specifically, the original research paper noted that the underlying sources of this vulnerability include “SSL libraries such as OpenSSL, GnuTLS, JSSE, CryptoAPI, etc., as well as higher-level data transport libraries such as cURL, Apache HttpClient, andurllib, that act as wrappers around SSL libraries.” The authors also cited the concern that software may leverage “Web-services middleware such as Apache Axis, Axis 2 or Codehaus XFire.”

Sucuri found that use of these libraries made it hard or impossible to check revocation status of a TLS certificate, as well as other verification problems. This would leave the client open to a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack.

The TLS Certificate Problem

Here’s how such an attack would work: The server on the other end of the TLS conversation — the API server — authenticates itself by sending an X.509 certificate to the client. The client must verify the certificate’s signature against the list of known root certificates.

If unchecked, the validity of the X.509 certificate is in question, and the client can be spoofed by the invalid certificate of the API server. The user wouldn’t even know the spoofing was taking place since the browser is untouched in all of this.

PHP addressed some of these concerns in its 5.6 release; Python did the same in 2014.

Sucuri researchers decided to use these new languages and see what would still break by testing TLS. According to the blog, “all programming language implementations fail to check if a certificate is revoked,” which is a recognized OWASP vulnerability. So things are broken by default unless corrective action is taken.

Mitigation Methods

There are some mitigation routes available. Upgrading to the latest version of languages will remove many certificate verification problems, although not the revocation aspect.

With Python, for example, one must pass the context parameter to verify the certificate. Similarly, the http.client.HTTPSConnection constructor must also pass the context parameter.

TLS implementation in PHP 5.5 and below is broken with the use of stream functions, Sucuri reported. Using cURL functions instead of stream functions and upgrading to PHP 5.6 whenever possible will help.

There are also Web services that can test any APIs a server is using. This kind of service can identify problem situations that may arise from the use of shared or unmaintained programs.

The end result is that TLS can still be broken, even four years after significant faults were pointed out. The remedies are there, but their use must be vigilant for them to be effective.

More from

When ransomware kills: Attacks on healthcare facilities

4 min read - As ransomware attacks continue to escalate, their toll is often measured in data loss and financial strain. But what about the loss of human life? Nowhere is the ransomware threat more acute than in the healthcare sector, where patients’ lives are literally on the line.Since 2015, there has been a staggering increase in ransomware attacks on healthcare facilities. And the impacts are severe: Diverted emergency services, delayed critical treatments and even fatalities. Meanwhile, the pledge some ransomware groups made during…

AI and cloud vulnerabilities aren’t the only threats facing CISOs today

6 min read - With cloud infrastructure and, more recently, artificial intelligence (AI) systems becoming prime targets for attackers, security leaders are laser-focused on defending these high-profile areas. They’re right to do so, too, as cyber criminals turn to new and emerging technologies to launch and scale ever more sophisticated attacks.However, this heightened attention to emerging threats makes it easy to overlook traditional attack vectors, such as human-driven social engineering and vulnerabilities in physical security.As adversaries exploit an ever-wider range of potential entry points…

4 trends in software supply chain security

4 min read - Some of the biggest and most infamous cyberattacks of the past decade were caused by a security breakdown in the software supply chain. SolarWinds was probably the most well-known, but it was not alone. Incidents against companies like Equifax and tools like MOVEit also wreaked havoc for organizations and customers whose sensitive information was compromised.Expect to see more software supply chain attacks moving forward. According to ReversingLabs' The State of Software Supply Chain Security 2024 study, attacks against the software…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today