June 15, 2015 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

It’s been more than a year since Heartbleed, but companies remain nervous about widely used encryption software OpenSSL. This is understandable since the preexisting vulnerability put millions of websites and email servers at risk. But a thorough audit of this open-source SSL/TLS offering is now underway. As reported by Threatpost, the project has just released four new patches — 1.0.2b, 1.0.1n, 1.0.0s and 0.9.8zg — to deal with a number of moderate and low-severity issues. Here’s a quick recap.

Cleared Out

The biggest news from these updates? Logjam is finally cleared. Officially tracked as CVE-2015-4000, Logjam stemmed from a problem with Diffie–Hellman key exchanges. With millions of HTTPS, SSH and VPN servers using identical prime numbers for their key exchange, it became possible for attackers to use the same number field sieve over and over again to break individual connections. More worrisome? A flaw in the TLS protocol allowed man-in-the-middle attackers to downgrade connection security by exploiting the Diffie–Hellman exchange to use easily cracked 512-bit cryptography, which was coded into SSL by law in 1990 and still remains in many older deployments. As noted by CIO, releases 1.0.2b and 1.0.1n toss out 512-bit altogether and will only support handshakes of 768 bits or better. In a future patch, this limit will be raised to 1024 bits.

Other Issues With OpenSSL

New OpenSSL patches also addressed several other low-severity issues such as potential memory corruption. In versions 1.0.1, 1.0.0 and 0.9.8, it was possible for a DTLS peer to receive application data between the ChangeCipherSpec and Finished messages. When buffered, this data could generate an “invalid free,” resulting in segmentation faults or memory corruption. According to Softpedia, there’s also a fix for denial-of-service (DoS) conditions that caused out-of-bounds reads in the X509_cmp_time function, which is supposed to check the length of the ANS1_TIME string but may read a few bytes out-of-bounds. Combined with X509’s ability to accept arbitrarily assigned fractional seconds in its time string, it’s possible for attackers to create fake, malformed certificates that crash applications designed to verify these certificates.

Alone, none of these vulnerabilities is particularly damning, but they’re further proof that open-source legacy code often comes with a host of hidden problems. It appears, however, that the OpenSSL project is making good on its promise to evaluate existing code line-by-line and address these vulnerabilities before another Heartbleed-type event occurs. Best bet? Update OpenSSL ASAP and keep an eye on all future updates.

More from

When ransomware kills: Attacks on healthcare facilities

4 min read - As ransomware attacks continue to escalate, their toll is often measured in data loss and financial strain. But what about the loss of human life? Nowhere is the ransomware threat more acute than in the healthcare sector, where patients’ lives are literally on the line.Since 2015, there has been a staggering increase in ransomware attacks on healthcare facilities. And the impacts are severe: Diverted emergency services, delayed critical treatments and even fatalities. Meanwhile, the pledge some ransomware groups made during…

AI and cloud vulnerabilities aren’t the only threats facing CISOs today

6 min read - With cloud infrastructure and, more recently, artificial intelligence (AI) systems becoming prime targets for attackers, security leaders are laser-focused on defending these high-profile areas. They’re right to do so, too, as cyber criminals turn to new and emerging technologies to launch and scale ever more sophisticated attacks.However, this heightened attention to emerging threats makes it easy to overlook traditional attack vectors, such as human-driven social engineering and vulnerabilities in physical security.As adversaries exploit an ever-wider range of potential entry points…

4 trends in software supply chain security

4 min read - Some of the biggest and most infamous cyberattacks of the past decade were caused by a security breakdown in the software supply chain. SolarWinds was probably the most well-known, but it was not alone. Incidents against companies like Equifax and tools like MOVEit also wreaked havoc for organizations and customers whose sensitive information was compromised.Expect to see more software supply chain attacks moving forward. According to ReversingLabs' The State of Software Supply Chain Security 2024 study, attacks against the software…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today